<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>....The Great Biofuels Con</title>
		<description>Comments for ....The Great Biofuels Con at http://cannazine.co.uk , comment 0 to 1 out of 1 comments</description>
		<link>http://cannazine.co.uk</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 16:21:09 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FeedCreator 1.7.2</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Good article, but..</title>
			<link>http://cannazine.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=4710&amp;Itemid=1581#pc_107</link>
			<description>A great rambling read, which points out the history of bio-fuels, and yet the real &quot;news&quot; in the piece was limited to just a single line...&quot;A Cornell University study shows that biofuel production from farm crops such as corn takes 29 per cent more energy than is yielded by the fuel itself (although second-generation biofuel crops, such as hemp, are much more efficient).

For years the cannabis/hemp community's have pointed out the unsurpassed ability of industrial hemp to sequester far more CO2 from the atmosphere than food crops grown for fuel use. But no-one was listening. It was all just a ploy to aid the greater cannabis legalisation debate.

Today however, it seems we were proved right.

red dragon - red dragon</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 10:50:28 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
